We first became aware of the tree health pilot (THP) scheme in 2021 when we received a Statutory Plant Health Notice (SPHN) for trees infected by one of the specified pests. The THP scheme has been designed to help slow the spread of pests and diseases affecting trees in England. There are grants available for larch trees with Phytophthora ramorum, spruce trees affected by Ips typographus, sweet chestnut trees with Phytophthora ramorum or sweet chestnut blight, oak trees with oak processionary moth (OPM) and ash trees with ash dieback. In our case, the Larger Eight-toothed Spruce Bark Beetle [Ips typographus] had been found in the Norway spruce and we were instructed to fell, move, process and destroy all spruce trees in the defined area of the wood. Strict but clear directions were given regarding the ‘how, when and where’ for the felling and processing. An initial site visit and ongoing support from the Forestry Commission and their Plant Health Forestry Team allowed us to follow the process of applying for a THP grant with ease. We submitted the application and received confirmation that the grant application was successful, at which point it was over to the team undertaking the felling. Once complete a final inspection from the Forestry Commission took place to ensure we adhered to the agreed method statement (as specified in the SPHN) and then we were able to submit the claim. This claim was processed and received – all within approx. 3 weeks. Fast forward to 2023. One of the woods we are managing in the southeast (which lies within the Ips typographus demarcated area) has a small stand of Norway spruce (approx. 0.5 hectare). Some of the trees are damaged, stressed or dead, and at risk of providing the right conditions for the eight-toothed spruce bark beetle. Advice from the Forestry Commission is: How does felling healthy spruce help the situation? This reduces the opportunity for colonisation [of the beetle] and may sometimes be required as a precaution to ensure that trees that could be potentially infested are removed. Removing spruce as a host from the demarcated area entirely will limit the possibility of populations of Ips typographus establishing and prevent spread to other areas. Predicted climate change means that what is currently healthy spruce may not remain so over future years, hence early felling could reduce the risk of these areas becoming future outbreak sites. We decided to investigate whether the THP scheme could support the proactive felling and extraction of the Norway spruce. We submitted an Expression of Interest for the THP scheme, the Forestry Commission undertook a site visit and were able to confirm there was no Ips found in the wood, and we were eligible to apply for the grant. We concurrently applied for a felling licence to clear fell the compartment of Norway spruce. It is worth noting, if an SPHN is served then normally there are no restocking conditions applied however restocking and maintenance grants are available to support restoring woodland In this case there are restocking conditions in line with the felling licence – an opportunity to plant and enable native broadleaves to thrive – that can also be grant-aided. An application for the THP scheme was submitted and we subsequently received a grant offer which was accepted. What next? A pre-felling survey was required in order to determine pest freedom for Ips typographus, and the authorisation for harvesting operations remains valid for 3 months. [caption id="attachment_40238" align="aligncenter" width="675"] Galleries formed by the beetles[/caption] An inspection for Ips typographus will need to take place before any felled timber can be taken off site – the advice is to fell and move the timber quickly rather than leaving stacks in the wood. The felling commences this week and should only take 5 days, and we plan to restock with native broadleaves over the winter. The Forestry Commission has produced a very useful guide Ips typographus: Guidance on the movement restrictions of spruce trees - Forestry Commission (blog.gov.uk) but throughout the whole process the Forestry Commission and Plant Health team have been really supportive and quick to answer queries about Ips, the THP grant scheme and the forestry operations. My advice if you have a stand of Spruce – is to speak to your Forestry Commission Woodland Officer about getting involved with the Tree Health Pilot scheme or visit their website to find out more: Tree health pilot scheme - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) Last week we hosted a number of people from the Forestry Commission, the Plant Health Forestry team, Forest Research, and DEFRA. They are continually evolving the scheme to understand how best to provide this vital funding to woodland owners to enable and encourage management of spruce and Ips. We were pleased to say they have, however,  not found it in the wood!

Across the world there may be three trillion trees. A mature tree may have 200,000 leaves, so there are a lot of leaves in the world - not counting those on herbaceous plants, grasses and shrubs.  The broad structure of a leaf is outlined here in woodlands.co.uk Tree ID. The leaf is the site of photosynthesis, providing food for the tree, and oxygen for us.  As the leaf is rich in nutrients, it is a source of nutrition for many organisms - other than the tree.  Oak trees are said to support over 2000 species, ranging from mammals, birds, beetles, spiders, fungi - through leaf-based food chains.  Leaves also support many micro-organisms through the detrital food chain (the decomposition of leaves in the litter layer and the soil). We do not eat many tree leaves, though some do make their way into our diet.  For example, the evergreen shrub Camellia sinensis is widely grown in many parts of the world for the production of tea.  The young leaves can be picked in spring and dried to make tea.  Leaves of other plants are used in various herbal infusions or for flavouring such as bay, sage, oregano, thyme etc. The fact that leaves are attractive to so many herbivores means that trees (and other plants) take measures to protect themselves. Some measures are physical - such as spines, thorns, prickles etc.   But when is a thorn a thorn, rather than a spine or a prickle?  These terms are used casually and interchangeably.  Botanically speaking, they are all ‘spinose structures’ that is hard, rigid extensions or modifications of leaves, roots, or stems - all of which have sharp, stiff ends and all have the same role - to deter animals from eating the plant that bears them.  Plants that bear sharp structures that deter herbivory are termed spinescent.  There are differences between these various ‘structures’. thorns are derived from shoots (they may be branched or not, may or may not have leaves). The thorns of Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna) can bear leaves. spines are derived from leaves (they may be formed from all of the leaf or just part of it and like thorns they have vascular tissue*) prickles are derived from the epidermis (the outer layer of cells of a stem, root or a leaf).   Prickles may be found almost anywhere on a plant and they do not have vascular tissue inside.  Wild lemon and lime trees (Genus: Citrus) have spines, which protect young plants and indeed the fruits. The defences on roses are often described as thorns, but they are prickles, as they do not have vascular tissue (xylem and phloem) inside them. Sometimes, the leaf epidermis forms smaller, ‘simpler’ physical barriers called trichomes.  These are outgrowths of epidermal tissue but generally consist of only a few cells which form a defence against small insects.  Equally, a thick,  waxy cuticle on a leaf may be something of a deterrent to smaller insects. Leaves sometimes form ‘teeth’ on the leaf margins and leaf apices.  A classic example of this is seen in Holly.  Holly leaves that develop at ground level are wavy, with large triangular ‘teeth’, bearing spines.   As the tree grows and holly can reach up to 80 feet,  the leaves become less spiny. The spines offer protection against grazing animals at the lower levels but are no longer needed when the trees reach a certain height. While physical defences such as spines, prickles and trichomes can deter various herbivores,  chemical defences may also be deployed.  Chemical defences can take different ‘forms’, such as  [caption id="attachment_28705" align="alignright" width="300"] Oozing latex - Euphorbia[/caption] tannins and phenolics. These create an bitter taste, they are complex polyphenols built from several phenolic molecules. Tannins are common in leaf tissues - particularly in the cells on the top surface of a leaf.  Scale leaves of buds are often particularly rich in tannins, reducing  the palatability or "tastiness" of the tissue thereby offering protection from herbivores.  Alkaloids are again usually bitter tasting compounds -, many of them derived from amino acids. Glycosides, as the name suggests, contain a sugar that is joined to another chemical, such as cyanide (as seen in bitter almonds (amygdalin). Another possibility is that leaves may emit chemicals (aka VOC’ volatile organic compounds, scents, aromas) that deter insect visitors, or if a leaf is under attack by a insect pest then a leaf may release a VOC to ‘warn’ nearby plants of the attack so that they produce chemicals that make the leaves distasteful. How long a leaf lives is incredibly variable, it may be eaten within days of its formation, it may last till autumn or it may last for years.  Many trees of temperate climes are deciduous, that is they shed their leaves come the shorter days of autumn.  The advantage of this is that the tree offers less resistance to the winds of winter, so is less likely to suffer physical damage (also true of snowfall).  The tree enters a state of dormancy until spring.  If in spring the tree produces flowers before the leaves (like Blackthorn) this  can facilitate wind dispersal of the pollen.  However, losing leaves each year means that their nutrients are either lost or have to be moved out and stored somewhere else.  Having longer lasting leaves means that nutrients are retained, which is a distinct advantage in a nutrient poor, harsh environment.  The longest lived leaves are found in a plant of the Namib Desert : Welwitschia.  This plant has two leaves throughout its life of some two thousand years.  The leaves may reach a length of 4 metres, the ends die or get worn away but the base generates new tissue.   Welwitschia is a type of Gymnosperm. Image (with thanks) by Nhelia from Pixabay  

An obvious answer to this question would be - caterpillars.  But when did butterflies first appear?  There are now some 160,000 species of moths and butterflies -worldwide.  Seemingly, they appeared some 100 million years ago  - in North America.  They evolved from nocturnal moths in the period when flowering plants were undergoing a major expansion (in the Cretaceous period).  Butterflies may have become diurnal to avoid predation by bats, or it may have been to take advantage of nectar production and availability [using the proboscis]. The butterflies and their caterpillars were able exploit the diverse range of food resources that these ‘new’ plants offered.  Butterflies moved out from North America to South America and then on to other parts of the world, though they probably did not arrive in Europe until some 17 million years ago. The evolutionary expansion of the butterflies has been investigated by researchers at the University of Florida; they analysed the genetic makeup of many species (from 90 countries).  They were able to build up a picture of the relationships between the various groups of butterflies and also determined their evolutionary point of origin.  They also catalogued the plants eaten by the caterpillars and it was found that some two thirds of butterfly caterpillars feed on plants from the legume family (the Fabaceae - peas and beans).  It is probable that the first butterfly caterpillars also fed on these plants. Research at the Georgetown University in Washington DC suggests that larger species of butterfly are ‘coping’ better with higher temperatures, associated with global warming.  Bigger wings seem to offer a greater range of movement and the opportunity to find new and suitable habitats.  Smaller butterflies are not faring so well.  The study involved an analysis of the range of some 90 North American species between 1970 and 2010, during which period the monthly minimum temperature increased by 1.5oF. Others have analysed the butterfly collections at the Natural History Museum, using digital technology.   The Natural History Museum’s British and Irish butterfly (and moth) collection is probably the oldest, largest, and most diverse of its kind in the world; some of the specimens date back over a hundred years The measurements of the various specimens were paired with the temperature that the species would have experienced in its caterpillar stage. It was found that for several species that the adult butterfly size increased as the temperature increased (during late larval stage). So, it may be that we will see a gradual increase in butterfly size as temperatures increase with global warming. Join the Big Butterfly Count ? Between Friday 14th July and Sunday 6th August , the big butterfly count will take place.   For full details visit : https://bigbutterflycount.butterfly-conservation.org/about Thanks to Angus for images.

Bumblebees (and bees) collect nectar and pollen.  Pollen is a vital food, used in the various stages of a bumblebee’s life. In Spring, newly emerged queens feed on pollen, then it is used to feed its their sister workers. The workers, in turn, take over the feeding of the colony (the larvae and future queens). If not enough pollen is collected, then the colony will not thrive, which can have significant long term effects.  Bumblebees are already facing many threats (from habitat fragmentation, agrochemicals and disease). The collection of pollen is a demanding process, and bumblebees will forage over a wide area.  They start their pollen collecting activities earlier than many insects as they can warm themselves up by ‘shivering’, that is, rapid muscle contractions which generate heat, warming the insects up ready for flight.  Bumblebees can fly in colder conditions and at higher elevations than many other insects. However, research at North Carolina State University has shown that the North American bumblebee (Bombus impatiens) can overheat when exposed to high temperatures (circa 42oC plus).  So,  if a bee is carrying a significant load of pollen and it is a hot day, its muscles have to work harder and the bee is at risk of overheating. A bumblebee loaded with pollen may be 2oC hotter than an unladen bee; it may be reaching its ‘thermal limit’ - a temperature at which its organs are damaged.  Climate change means that many parts of the world are now experiencing extreme weather events, when temperatures can reach into the forties. [caption id="attachment_39978" align="aligncenter" width="675"] Bumblee leaving foxglove[/caption] Increasing temperatures could affect the foraging activities of bumblebees in a significant way - affecting how much pollen is collected and how much pollination takes place.  If pollen collection is reduced then colony development is affected and so population numbers will be affected.  Bumblebees are key pollinators in natural and agricultural systems, and if their numbers decline there will be ecological and agricultural consequences.  

Scotland’s west coast has a number of temperate rain woodlands / forests. They are quite rare. The remnants of oak, birch, ash, native pine and hazel woodlands are small and isolated from each other. They are noteworthy for the diversity and richness of the bryophytes (mosses and liverworts) and lichens; found in abundance on the trees, rocks and on the ground.   Sadly, such woodlands have been in decline for some time. In the past, this woodland covered large areas of the west coast of Scotland, but much has been lost over the last two thousand years.  These woodlands / forests now cover a small area, just under 5% of the land. Factors that have contributed to the decline and loss of this woodland include:- mismanagement,  overgrazing by sheep and  invasion by non-native species [such as Rhododendron ponticum]. According to recent study by Scottish Environment LINK, deer now represent a considerable threat to the woodlands.  Whilst deer are part of woodland ecosystems, when their numbers increase beyond a certain point then they become a significant problem.  Deer numbers are now at historic highs in Scotland/  Money has been made available to manage surging deer populations, for example, through the provision of deer fencing.  However, the report considers that such fencing is “both expensive and often ultimately ineffective”.  More needs to be done if deer damage is to be reduced and allow regeneration of the woodlands. Developing a community approach to deer stalking and management will be important, combined with the use of technologies such as thermal and drone surveying. A greater focus on the management of roe and sika deer, combined with the removal of Rhododendron ponticum will be needed if the woodlands are to flourish and expand. see also : https://www.thescottishfarmer.co.uk/news/23637346.soaring-deer-numbers-see-new-powers-land-managers/   [caption id="attachment_39688" align="aligncenter" width="675"] Rhododendron ponticum, these plants were growing near the River Tay.[/caption] visit https://www.instagram.com/woodlands.co.uk/?hl=en  

Plants have existed for hundreds of millions of year - as algae, mosses, liverworts, ferns but flowering plants only appeared about 140 million years ago. The exact timing of their appearance is a matter of some debate (see article) They have been a massive evolutionary success, there are perhaps 300,000 to 400,000 species world wide.  They reproduce using pollen.  This is used to fertilise the ovules and produce viable seeds.  Most plants rely on insects to transfer this pollen to the ovules, indeed over 80% of flowering plants have relied on insects for this service.  To this end, flowering plants (Angiosperms) have evolved a number of inducements to attract insects : colour, scent and nectar. When we think of pollinators, we generally tend to think of bees, bumblebees, hover flies.  But when flowering plants first evolved, fossil evidence suggests that many of these flowers were quite small so it is probably that the first pollinators were also quite small, and hence able to access these small flowers.  The first pollinators were probably small flies, midges or beetles (more than 77,000 beetle species are estimated to visit flowers).  Quite when bees (and their pollen collecting activities) evolved is not known.   A recent analysis of the "family tree" of the families of flowering plants indicates when different plant families evolved and when various forms of pollination emerged.  Insect pollination is / was clearly the most common method of pollination,  and was probably the first means of pollination.  This analysis also indicated that other means of pollination (involving small mammals, birds, bats) have evolved several times, as has wind pollination.  Wind pollination seems to have evolved more often in open habitats and at higher altitudes , whereas animal pollination is associated with closed canopy tropical forests. The pollen of insect pollinated flowers is significantly different to that of wind pollinated species.  Flowers that are insect pollinated tend to produce pollen that is heavy, 'sticky' and protein-rich.   Pollen is an important constituent of the diet of many insects.  Wind pollinated species by contrast produce large quantities of pollen, the grains being light and small.