Leaves have three main parts:  The petiole, a stalk-like structure that connects the blade of the leaf to the stem of the plant. Some leaves don’t have petioles,  and are known as sessile leaves. The blade or lamina, usually the largest part of the leaf.  The edge of the leaf or the leaf margin may be described as entire, toothed, or lobed. The oak leaf, for example, is clearly lobed. The blade has many veins, forming a network, carrying water and nutrients, The base, the base is the region of the blade that attaches to the petiole. A leaf is said to be simple if its blade / lamina is undivided, if the ‘teeth’ or lobes do not reach down to the main vein of the leaf.  A compound leaf has several leaflets, which join up with a single leaf stalk or petiole. When identifying tree leaves, it is always important to look for the petiole,   as a single leaflet of a compound leaf can look like a simple leaf.  More details of leaf and tree structure can be found on this link on our website. Now for a challenge.  Can you or your children find a leaf (and name the tree it came from), that Has a serrated / toothed edge Has a lobed margin Has a smooth edge / margin Is a compound, palmate leaf Is a compound, pinnate leaf Is hairy Is not green, but red or a mixture of colours Is more or less circular Is fleshy / succulent Has spines on its edges Is needle shaped Has a thick (waxy?) cuticle or is very shiny Has net venation  is marcescent (might keep you hanging around) Go forage!

The terms ghosts and zombies often feature in films or TV programmes, but across the country the terms can also be applied to many hundreds, possibly thousands of lost and abandoned ponds.  Ponds have featured in the landscape for centuries or millennia.  Pingos -  formed in the depressions left after the last ice age. The middle of the C20th saw not only the destruction of many hedgerows, but the removal of many ponds.  This was particularly true in farming areas like East Anglia.  The strategy was to increase field size and allow access of complex machinery that was becoming available at that time; for example large combine harvesters.  Whilst the loss of the hedgerows and associated wildlife is well documented, the loss of ponds has not attracted so much attention.  Many hundred of ponds were filled in (often using the debris and material from the destruction of the hedgerows), to give a few more metres of arable land, and with machinery replacing horses the need for ‘watering holes’ diminished.  The infilled ponds are sometimes referred to as ghost ponds.  The location of these 'ponds' can sometimes be found  By studying old ordnance survey (or tithe) maps or  They may be visible using aerial photography / drones and picking up a different colour or shade of the crop growing in a field Noticing the accumulation of water after heavy rain in a slight depression, or a mist hovering over a particular part of a field A zombie pond is somewhat different.  It is a pond or very wet, marsh area which is shadowed by a tree canopy.  The pond has filled over many, many years with dead leaves, so that it has a deep layer of decomposing organic material.  The pond margins is generally overgrown, with willow and other vegetation where have begun to ‘invade’.  The pond is half dead / half alive, hence the term 'zombie'.  The area / water becomes anaerobic / anoxic, as the dead leaves rot and use up oxygen. Few life forms call it home - perhaps midge larvae or the occasional beetle. Indeed, such ponds may release not only carbon dioxide but also methane; the latter is a particularly potent greenhouse gas.  Zombie ponds may be found in woodlands, particularly where active management has fallen by the wayside. However, not all is lost, both ghost and zombie ponds can be resurrected.  In the case of ghost ponds, the infilling material / soil is dug out until the original base layer is reached.   This may be recognised by the dark, fine silt layer / sediment, which may contain the remnants of water snail shells.  Ideally, the excavation should mirror the original outline of the pond.  This may be determined in part by digging two trenches at right angles to each other. Details of the restoration procedure may be found here.   Freshly excavated ghost ponds should be left to fill with rainwater through the winter months, and left for plants and animal to colonise naturally.  Amazingly, several pond restoration projects have demonstrated that the original silt layer of the pond is a valuable seedbed of many aquatic and emergent plant species, even though the seeds may have lain there dormant for decades , possibly centuries.  The refreshed pond should also have a surrounding margin of land to separate it from any adjacent farmland activities - to prevent nutrient run off / pesticide application etc.  Further details of the restoration of lost ponds can be found at:- https://norfolkponds.org/ https://www.ucl.ac.uk/geography/news/2023/nov/bringing-ghost-ponds-back-life https://www.essexwt.org.uk/recovering-lost-ponds In the case of zombie ponds, there is a similar approach to restoration but it begins with the cutting back and / or removal of trees from around the pond to let light in.  Then the layers of rotting leaves / organic materials are scooped out, so that the original sediments of the pond are exposed.  The depth of the decomposing material may be quite significant.  However, with light pouring in and the rotting material removing the pond can soon develop a diverse community of plants (from the seedbed and pond 'visitors' e.g water-crowfoot, stoneworts, and animals).  The restoration / renewal of ponds in fields, meadows or woodlands makes a significant contribution to the biodiversity of an area. There is an excellent video about the restoration of ghost and zombie ponds on YouTube, featuring Professor Carl Sayer (UCL). Professor Sayer grew up in Norfolk, where many of these ‘hidden’ / lost ponds are to be found.  Visit the Razor Science Show “Bringing 'ghost' and 'zombie' ponds back from the dead”. [https://youtu.be/SYkbDdaUMBY?si=gd2jbfxk4iXLSFL5]  

While protecting dormouse habitats has become one of the big themes of British woodland conservation, it’s remarkable how little is actually known about these elusive creatures. At a recent dormouse education day led by Tom Fairfield, thirty enthusiastic conservationists fired off a barrage of questions—some of which even he struggled to answer. Why do we care about them? How many are there? Is their population stable or declining? However, “Dormouse Tom” was able to answer many other important questions about the hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius). For instance, they are widespread across southern and south-western England and in Wales (distribution map). He showed us dozens of photos of dormouse nests and demonstrated that hazel dormice aren’t restricted to hazel woodlands—they’ve been found in conifer plantations, and occasionally even on stony beaches. Tom believes the habitat protections put in place for the HS2 high-speed rail line don’t go far enough. The ecologists at Balfour Beatty only surveyed hazel woodlands along the planned route, ignoring other potential dormouse habitats. He’s learned a great deal about dormouse habits through two key methods: installing nest boxes and examining teeth marks left on discarded hazelnuts. If our roles were reversed, perhaps dormice would measure the human population by building us cosy hotels and searching for discarded apple cores. In late March and early April, dormice begin to emerge from hibernation, but they are nocturnal and difficult to spot—one of the ways they avoid predation. Tom acknowledges that some dormice are likely to be harmed during forestry operations, but there are steps foresters and builders can take to minimise the impact. His approach starts with surveys—though thorough ones can be costly. These, however, make it easier to implement core elements of a dormouse mitigation plan: avoiding key habitats, establishing buffer zones to protect woodland edges, and creating no-go areas during the breeding season (April to October). A forester from Natural Resources Wales attending the course pointed out a serious tension: if summer months are off-limits for forestry, operations must be pushed into winter, when wetter conditions and heavy machinery risk causing ruts and soil compaction. In parts of south-east England, the tiny hazel dormice are facing competition from the much larger edible dormouse (Glis glis), also known as the European fat dormouse. Introduced by the Romans and raised for food, these creatures were fattened in ceramic pots called gliraria and are still eaten today in countries like Slovenia and Croatia. Dormouse habitat protection seems set to remain a key part of British woodland conservation—partly because dormice are considered a “flagship species”: a charismatic and recognisable animal that represents deciduous woodland and helps rally public support for wider conservation efforts. Note there is a woodlands TV film about the hazel dormouse: [embed]https://youtu.be/COUh5ZluEew?si=1upUveV1FLoQRXV6[/embed]

The last century saw the destruction of many hedgerows, particularly in farming areas like East Anglia.  The logic behind this was : to increase field size and  allow ease of access of machinery, like combine harvesters that were coming available at that time.   Whilst the loss of the hedgerows and the associated wildlife is well documented, the loss of ponds during this time has not attracted the same level of attention.  Many hundreds of ponds were filled in, to give a few more metres of arable land.  The whereabouts of some of these ponds can sometimes be found on old ordnance survey maps.  Many were located on farmland and their origins may extend back centuries to when they were created as marl or clay pits, sometimes for the watering of livestock.  Some were formed in depressions (pingos) left after the last ice age. There are still  thousands of ponds across the UK but many are polluted to a greater or lesser extent, or drained.  The pollution may be associated with the the surrounding land use or agricultural runoff. Runoff may take the form of nitrates / phosphates from the use of fertilisers.  In freshwater systems, these nutrients can cause eutrophication. Other agricultural chemicals may enter ponds and water courses - insecticides, fungicides, herbicides etc. Consequently, out of the thousands of ponds, only a very small number provide a suitable habitat for pond organisms such as the medicinal leech.  Leeches are rarely found for the reasons cited above but also because, as agriculture became more mechanised and less reliant on ‘animal power’ [horses, oxen], the ponds  (or wetlands) are no longer visited by these animals, which leeches would have fed on.  Leeches used to be abundant, but their number declined when their use in blood letting was largely abandoned, and their natural habitats were drained or damaged.  The medicinal leech is one of the largest leeches found in the UK, it can grow to a length of ten centimetres, and may have stripes / patterns on its body.  Some of the ponds that are home to medicinal leeches have been designated  Sites of Special Scientific Interest.  Since historic times, the extraction of blood by leeches was deemed to be a ‘healing process’ for patients. This practice of hirundotherapy / bloodletting spread widely and the collection of leeches resulted in the over-exploitation of many populations.  The leeches were used widely in the treatment of many conditions and  diseases such as cholera, regardless of whether or not they were effective.  At one stage, leeches were in such demand that there were ‘leech farms’, and  people could earn a living as leech collectors.  Indeed, so commonplace was leech collection that Wordsworth wrote about it in his poem Resolution and Independence : “He told, that to these waters he had come To gather leeches, being old and poor: Employment hazardous and wearisome! And he had many hardships to endure: From pond to pond he roamed, from moor to moor; Housing, with God’s good help, by choice or chance; And in this way he gained an honest maintenance.” Although the use of medicinal leeches was discredited and virtually abandoned for many decades, they are medically effective in certain circumstances.  The leeches produce a saliva which  contains a number of different proteins. These help the leech to feed by keeping the blood from clotting, and actually increasing blood flow to the leech at the point of attachment.  Some of these proteins act as anticoagulants (notably hirudin),   It is also possible that the saliva contains an 'anaesthetic / antiseptic' as leech bites are generally not painful. These leeches have now found a use in microsurgery.  They are used to stimulate the circulation in tissues which experience post-operative congestion.  They are helpful in finger reattachment and reconstructive surgery of the ear, nose, lip, and eyelid. The creation of a network of new or restored freshwater ponds across the landscape will be needed if natural populations of the leech are to expand. 

Back in the Nineteenth Century, John Bennet Lawes, a Victorian entrepreneur founded a research station at Rothamsted Manor.  It was to investigate the impact of organic and inorganic fertilisers on crop yield.  Lawes had a factory making some of the first artificial fertilisers.  The manor was to become the Rothamsted Experimental Station, now known as Rothamsted Research.  It has two of the longest running experiments - the Broad balk experiment and the Park Grass experiment - started in 1856. The Park Grass area was started by Lawes and Gilbert.  Its original purpose was to investigate ways of improving the yield of hay through the use of inorganic fertilisers or organic manures. Different strips of land received varying amounts of fertiliser to none.  It soon became clear that the different treatments had a dramatic effect on the species composition of what had been a uniform sward.  There are 35-45 plant species on the unfertilised plots but only 2 or 3 species on some of the fertilised plots. Fertilisers create conditions that allow fast growing grasses to dominate the vegetation.  More recently the plots have received attention (by Dr Balfour et al, Sussex University) for the number of pollinators that they support.  It was found that High levels of common fertilisers on grassland halves the pollinator numbers. Increasing the amount / availability of NPK (nitrogen phosphorus and potassium) on grassland reduces flower numbers five fold. Bee number were most affected.  There were 9 times more bees in untreated plants compared to plots with the most fertiliser input.   The number of bees, hoverflies, butterflies, wasps and flies on each experiment strip was counted. Whilst all pollinator types were present on untreated plots or with low fertiliser levels, only flies and beetles were present on high fertiliser plots. Interestingly, plots with lime added which changed the soil pH had more pollinators (50%) and flower species than those not treated with lime. as fertiliser use increases so there is a decrease in pollinator numbers.   Though these observations are for a specific area of managed grassland, they can be considered in a broader context.  Many grasslands and meadows, which offered homes to pollinators, have been lost in recent times,.  Over a similar period of time, farmlands across the country have extended (eg. hedgerow removal, ploughing meadows) and have been making significant use of fertiliser to improve crop yield, but the wider effects of these changes on insect populations and biodiversity in general has not received enough attention. The ‘excessive’ use of fertilisers can lead to soil eutrophication, air pollution, freshwater eutrophication and a loss of biodiversity.  It can favour botanical thugs )like nettles and invasive species.  We do know that there have been dramatic falls in insect numbers in recent years in what has been termed the ‘insect armageddon or the ‘insect apocalypse’.  Whilst there are many factors at play affecting insect numbers (such as the intensive use of pesticides), the maintenance or the reintroduction of natural areas [with low nutrient soil and native wild flowers] within farmland would at least offer sanctuary to many insects / pollinators that are vital for our crops.  Any reduction in the use of fertilisers would help reduce the CO2 emissions resulting from the Haber–Bosch process, used to produce ammonia and ammonium nitrate. Interesting fact : the institute employed Ronald Fisher in the 1920s to analyse data collected from many experiments.  His work and that of other statisticians means that many consider Rothamsted the birthplace of modern statistical theory (e.g. analysis of variance) and practice.  

Trees and shrubs that grow in temperate regions, where the seasons alternate (warm / cold, dry /wet) create annual rings.  The rings formed in a deciduous tree (like beech, oak, lime) are generally quite noticeable when the tree is felled.  They may be counted to give an indication of the age of the tree.  Annual rings are formed because there is a difference in the creation of ‘wood’ / xylem tissue when growth is fast in the Spring and slow as Autumn progresses.  The thickness of the rings from year to year reflects the changing climate and environment that the tree experiences during its life. Xylem tissue is one component of a tree’s vascular tissue.  The xylem tissue conducts water and minerals around the plant, whereas phloem tissue transports sugars and other organic molecules.  Lying between these two tissues is the cambium.  This is a layer of dividing cells, which becomes active in the Spring forming new cells some of which will form new phloem tissue and others develop into xylem tissue. The cells that will form the xylem tissue undergo a series of dramatic changes.   The walls of the cells that will form the long tubes of the xylem are made of cellulose to begin with, but then they are strengthened with lignin.  Lignin is the ‘stuff of wood’.  It is a complex material - made from polyphenols and other substances such as pectins and hemicelluloses.  It is a waterproofing material that is highly resistance to decay.  It lines the tubes of the xylem so that water can be transported from the roots, up the trunk / stem to the leaves etc.  The xylem vessels that form in the Spring [early wood] have a greater diameter than those formed later in the year [late wood].  It is this size difference in the vessels that results in the visible ‘rings’ when a tree is felled. Careful study of tree rings can reveal information about climate, sometimes extending back through the centuries   using species such as the long lived Bristlecones. It has given rise to the discipline of dendrochronology [link opens / downloads a PDF].  This information can then be ‘combined’ with tree ring data from intact remains in cold, dry (and often high altitude) environments and material from archaeological sites.   Apart from measuring the ‘width’ of the annual rings by creating thin section of the wood that can be examined under microscope, it is also possible to use staining techniques to reveal which xylem tissue has a higher / lower, lignin / cellulose content.  By using a double staining technique with the dyes Safranin and Astra Blue, it is possible to identify which xylem vessels are rich in lignin, and which have more cellulose.  Tree rings which stain largely blue are formed from cells which have not lignified properly.  Lignin stains red.  A recent study of blue rings in Pine trees and Juniper shrubs suggests that blue rings are indicators of cold summers. These two species are typical of the upper tree line in Northern Norway. Furthermore, blue rings have the potential to weaken the pine trees, leaving them more susceptible to mechanical damage and / or disease.  This study has identified blue rings associated with the cold summers of 1877 and 1902, which might have been caused by the eruptions of volcanoes as far away as Ecuador and Martinique. Note : The xylem tissue in conifers is different to that of broad leaved deciduous trees.  It is made up of shorter structures called tracheids, which pass water from one to the next via pits - ‘pores’ in their lignified walls. For more information on Blue rings in Black Pine, click here  

Burrs or Burls? What’s in a name. What are they?  They are woody outgrowths found on stems, branches, and often on roots.  They are  typically rounded, somewhat bulbous in form.  Burrs develop as a result of rapid and uncontrolled growth,  leading to a dense and irregular wood grain beneath the external bark of the structure. The uncontrolled and abnormal growth may result from various stressors, such as :- Physical damage eg. wounds, where branches are lost in high winds, injuries as the result of boring insects, or damage from squirrels or deer. Infections caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi may trigger burr formation  These infections can induce  hormonal changes that affect cell division. Environmental factors such as extreme weather events or pollution can influence tree physiology and growth, as can somatic mutations. In most cases, a burr does not harm a tree, indeed they may persist for decades.  If the burr formed due to injury to the tree, then it could even be considered protective.  However, If a burr develops on a branch then it may become so heavy that the branch breaks. Burrs may be seen on a variety of trees, but some species are more prone to developing them, notably oaks, maples, walnut, and birch.  Coastal redwoods are known to produce burrs of considerable size, sometimes reaching several metres in width and even encircling the trunk of the massive trees..  Although burrs may not be visually appealing from the outside, internally the complex grain pattern means makes them highly valued for woodworking.  They are used to create bowls, furniture, musical instruments and sculptures.  It is generally unwise to cut a burr from a living tree; instead they are typically harvested from fallen or dead trees. Thanks to Steve Sangster for Burr images.

In the southern parts of Britain, beech is a dominant woodland/forest tree, further north, oak is prominent.  Beech trees are often large with smooth, silvery grey bark.  They can grow to a height of 150 feet, with a stout trunk (perhaps 10 feet in diameter) and an impressive canopy. The leaves, certainly on younger trees, may persist throughout winter in a brown and withered state — a phenomenon known as marcescence.  The root system of the beech is shallow but extensive.  The large roots spread out in all directions, and establish mycorrhizal connections, often with fungi such as Russula and Laccaria.  The mycorrhizae help the trees by supplying mineral nutrients (like phosphate) and water.  In return, the trees provide various organic nutrients to the fungus. Despite these associations, beech trees are susceptible to drought.  After the drought of the summer of 1976, many beech trees died. It is not surprising that people are concerned about the ‘health’ of beech trees in light of climate change — higher temperatures, extreme weather,  specifically periods of drought.  It was thought that climate change would reduce growth of trees like beech through the increasing frequency and intensity of summer droughts. Recently, a study conducted by researchers at the University of Liverpool looked at tree growth data (annual growth ring and masting data) accumulated over more than forty  years and found that growth was indeed reduced (by some 28%).   However, the reason was that the trees were investing more energy into reproduction than into growth.  Beech trees are known for their mast years - see previous blog on masting. In a mast year, a tree will produce enormous quantities of seeds (beech nuts✝︎). However, it seems that the changing climate is causing a ‘breakdown’ in the masting process, and whilst the trees now reproduce more more frequently.  Total seed production and seed viability is reduced.   It may be that the diminished reproductive capacity of beech trees as a result of climate change will affect their ability to regenerate woodlands and forests in the UK and indeed across Europe in the coming years.   [caption id="attachment_41997" align="aligncenter" width="675"] Marcescence[/caption] ✝︎ Masting means that so many seeds that even the most voracious squirrels cannot consume all of them * After the summer of 1976, drought damaged trees were still dying some 15 years later.