Honeybees, bumblebees and butterflies are always cited as being important for flower pollination. Indeed, without them many of our food crops would ‘fail’.  But what about moths?  Well, recent research has found that they too are efficient pollinators.  A recent study compared the role of nocturnal and day time pollinators.  Much scientific research has focused on daytime pollinators, like honey bees and bumblebees, but little is known about the night time pollinators.  So a study was devised, which focused on the day and night visitors to bramble flowers. Bramble may be a bit prickly to us but for bees and other insects it is important source of nectar and pollen, from early spring through to autumn.  The study was carried out out in the summer moths (when night is only one third of the daily cycle).  Trail cameras were used to record visitors to the bramble flowers over three days, also special bags were used to cover the flowers for different times in order to determine the effectiveness of the different pollinators on pollination and fruit formation.  One group of the bramble flowers was covered up for the three days.  A second group was bagged up for the day time.   The final set was covered only at night.  The number of pollinator visits was recorded as was the resulting pollination and fruit formation.   At night, moths were the only insect visitors of the pale pink / white flowers of the bramble, and they also proved to be very effective pollinators. It is not clear why moths were more effective, perhaps the time they spend visiting a flower is a critical factor.  They do spend more time rummaging in a flower than day time insects [hoverflies, butterflies, bees etc].     There are only some sixty species of butterfly in the UK but over two thousand species of moth.  But like butterflies, moths are vulnerable with many of our larger moths in decline.  The challenges that they face as the same as those that threaten many insects namely: Pesticides Habitat loss Climate change But moths face an additional challenge - artificial light at night. This interferes with the feeding behaviour of their larvae / caterpillars, it also affects the feeding and breeding of the adults.   Thus, moths are not only important pollinators but a vital component to the biodiversity of an ecosystem.  They also are a food source bats and birds. Moths can be helped by: By allowing a patch of brambles and / or wild flowers in your garden Persuading the council to allow wild flowers to grow and flourish on roadside verges, ‘spare’ plots of land etc. Asking the local council to reduce night time lighting where it safe to do so.   At home, limiting the use of outdoor lights at night, draw curtains and blinds to limit light spill to the exterior. As insects are in decline generally, (see the  woodlands.co.uk splatometer blog) it is important to help our pollinators - ensuring that they still ‘have a home’ at the end of the day.  

JAcross Europe, the red squirrel is recognised as an endangered species.  The U.K populations are at risk due due to :- Habitat loss Competition with Grey Squirrels The effects of the squirrel pox virus The last two are a result of the introduction of the grey squirrel from America in the 19th century. Red squirrels are at home in all types of woodland and may even be seen in parks and gardens, but they 'like' mixed conifer forests best.  Scotland is home to many of the U.K's red squirrels. The number of squirrels is quite small – estimates of their number vary, perhaps there are less than 300,000* across the whole of Britain.   The status of red squirrel populations is a matter of considerable interest. [caption id="attachment_42416" align="alignleft" width="300"] Screenshot[/caption]  In 2014, it was noticed that some members of the Scottish red squirrel populations had abnormal growths on their ears, snout and limbs. Further investigations found that the squirrels were suffering from leprosy.  Leprosy  is a bacterial infection,  caused by two different species of mycobacteria: Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium lepromatosis.   The two types of  bacteria have slightly different distributions in the squirrel populations of the U.K.  Whilst leprosy in squirrels was first reported in 2014,  it is likely that the disease has been around in squirrel populations for much, much longer, probably hundreds of years. Profesor Verena Schünemann,  Christian Urban et al have studied bacterial DNA extracted from human skeletons, dating from 400 CE to 1400 CE with deformities associated with leprosy.   They 'reconstructed' the genetic makeup of mediaeval forms of the bacterium.  Leprosy was not uncommon across Europe in mediaeval times - indeed up to the sixteenth century.   Disease, in its many forms , was a common part of life -  dysentery, diphtheria, typhoid, smallpox, and plague meant that life expectancy was limited. The last indigenous case of leprosy in the UK dates back to 1798.  In humans, leprosy causes muscle and nerve damage, which lead to deformity, blindness and disability.   Interestingly, research by Dr. Sarah Inskip has revealed that a pre-Norman skull [found in Hoxne in Suffolk] had a leprosy strain related to a form known to affect squirrels.  The same strain has also been found in medieval scandinavian skeletons.  It is possible that the  trade in squirrel pelts (and meat) could have contributed to the spread of the disease. Strong trade connections with Denmark and Sweden were in full flow in the medieval period.  Squirrel fur was also used as a lining for fine clothes and squirrels were kept as pets by some. The historical spread of leprosy is not fully understood.  The disease may have passed from squirrels to humans or vice versa in historical times.  Further study of the microbes that cause this disease (and that in squirrels) will help determine how the disease is acquired and transmitted.    The risk to human health is low. (Even so, good hygiene should be followed during any contact with wild animals). Professor Anna Meredith  (University of Edinburgh) is researching into this disease in squirrels.   Further reading / articles: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14819991-200-virus-blamed-on-invading-squirrels/ https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aah3783 https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/oct/25/medieval-love-of-squirrel-fur-may-have-helped-spread-leprosy-study-reveals https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171025103109.htm

Bee:wild [https://beewild.rewild.org] is a new science-led, global campaign, which aims to help and save pollinators - particularly bees.  The woodlands blog has reported on the decline in many insect populations in recent times - referring to the ‘insect apocalypse’, the ‘windscreen test’,  and the ‘splatometer’. The causes for insect loss are many but critically important are : Habitat loss and fragmentation The extensive use of pesticides, herbicides & fungicides. These may be coupled with other issues such as climate change, and pollution from fertilisers into rivers and streams.  However, in recent times, we may now need “to add to the mix” - Wars and conflict.  These can result in changing patterns of agriculture so that the range of crops grown is reduced, which means there are less foraging opportunities for pollinators. The ubiquity of plastics. Specifically microplastics and nano plastics.  Microplastics come in part from larger plastic pieces that degrade into smaller pieces, but also from microbeads.  Microbeads are very small pieces of polyethylene plastic that are added to health and beauty products, such as certain skin cleansers and toothpastes. Now microplastics are to be found everywhere from the deep oceans, to Arctic snow and Antarctic ice. They are also found in the hives of honey bees.  Quite what their effect is on bees or indeed many other organisms (including us) is not yet clear. Artificial light.  Much of our world is illlluminated 24/7.  Towns and cities rarely experience total darkness, even the countryside is lit up by the lighting on roads and motorways.  This artificial light is not without effect.  Areas ‘bathed’ in light may Deter nocturnal moths from visiting flowers, reducing pollination and egg laying. Make the night flying moths ‘easier targets’ for predators (such as bats). Affect the feeding habits of moth caterpillars. Air and water pollution.  Both air and water are increasingly filled with a ‘cocktail’ of chemicals, some derived from the extensive use of pesticides (insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, some come from use of fertilisers).  Particulates released from car tyres and brake pads contribute to the ‘chemical smorgasbord’.  Whilst the effect of any given chemical may be sub-lethal, small, or non existent the combined effect of the mixture may be significant, even deadly.   Wild fires.  Add into this anthropogenic concoction mentioned above, the chemicals released from wild fires - such as those seen recently in Canada, Siberia, Australia and the United States.  These fires not only release a complex mixture of particulates and chemicals, they also destroy habitats for pollinators.  The sheer scale of these fires makes the recovery of ecosystems that much harder. Bee:wild [https://beewild.rewild.org] suggests a number of measures to help pollinators : A swifter move to electric cars to reduce levels of atmospheric pollution Production of crops with enhanced nectar and pollen production to benefit pollinators Creation of more flower-rich areas, for example, within solar farms Use of RNAi therapy to specifically target pests and not beneficial insects.  RNA interference is a technique that uses natural cellular processes to silence or reduce the expression of particular genes in a particular organism.  Thus, it might render a pest sterile. Introduction of measures to reduce the use of ‘our’ chemicals, used to enhance the growth of crop or animals. Such measures when coupled with the creation of urban rich flower gardens, rewilding and the protection of remaining areas of natural habitats will help pollinators, and insects in general.

Willow bark and the covid virus. The Covid pandemic created great strains on health and business services, and the virus continues to impact society in many ways.  It is not surprising that there is an ongoing search for anti-viral agents. Finnish scientists have found that willow bark may have a role to play. Willow bark has been used as a natural medicinal product over the centuries as an effective agent to treat pain and inflammation.  The anti-inflammatory properties of the bark are generally ascribed to salicin, which was to lead to the development of acetylsalicylic acid, that is aspirin.  The Finnish scientists ground up the willow bark in hot water and then sieved it to create an ‘extract’.   This solution was then added to a number of cell cultures that were exposed to different viruses (enteroviruses, a seasonal coronavirus and SARS CoV2).  They then monitored the viral activity, cell infection and viral replication  The extract had an effect on all of the viruses.  In some cases, the extract affected the envelope of the virus (a structure surrounding the viral genetic material) so the viruses essentially broke down, whereas others were prevented from releasing their genetic material and reproducing.  Specifically, though the Covid-19 virus could enter cells when treated with the extract, it could not reproduce once inside. The research team analysed the extract’s chemical composition and tested some known constituents of bark but concluded the success of the extract probably resulted from the interactions of different biologically active compounds.  Compounds in the extract included many complex chemicals (for example, hydroxycinnamic acids, salicylates, flavonoids, flavan-3-ols, and proanthocyanidins (polyphenols).  Further work will focus on the role / interactions of these various compounds. The Hazel Dormouse in peril. The numbers of the hazel dormouse have fallen dramatically since the turn of the century.  The dormouse has disappeared from Staffordshire, Northumberland and Herefordshire in the last few years.  This loss is attributed to The destruction / fragmentation of their habitats Poor management of woodlands and hedgerows, leading to a loss of diversity / niches Rising deer numbers, feeding on saplings and shrubs Extreme weather patterns may also play a part Captive-bred dormice have been re-introduced to some 25 sites in 13 counties across the country, sadly nine of these reintroductions were not successful.  Dormouse bridges have been created to enable the animals to move between areas dissected by major roads (such as the M1), others are planned.   The dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) is a nocturnal animal and lives mainly in deciduous woodland,  it feeds among the branches of trees and shrubs. the dormouse rarely descends to the ground.  It feeds on a wide variety of 'foods' ;  flowers (nectar and pollen), fruits (berries and nuts), certain buds and leaves and some insects, such as aphids and caterpillars. The hazel dormouse is regarded as a ‘flagship species’, that is to say, if the dormice are thriving then it is likely that other species are too from butterflies to birds such as the nightingale.  Dormice are currently assessed as ‘Vulnerable’ to extinction in Britain under IUCN Red List criteria, but recent studies suggest a classification of ‘Endangered’ might be more appropriate.  Certainly, their future is uncertain. Detailed information on the hazel dormouse is available at PTES (note this link opens a PDF).  Their report details the state of hazel dormice in 2023. zsaqwa https://youtu.be/4u-yMkXOuTY Changes in the Boreal Forests. Boreal forests encircle the northern reaches of the Earth, lying just below the treeless under of the Arctic.  These forest cover large areas of Alaska, Canada, Scandinavia and Siberia.  These forests contain billions of trees, most are conifers but birch, poplar and aspen may also be found.  The trees (and soils) contribute significantly to the cycling of carbon in nature, absorbing carbon dioxide in photosynthesis. They are also home to many species of migratory birds, plus predator species such as lynx and brown bears, and wandering herds of moose. Due to the remoteness of these forests, they have remained (until relatively recently) unaffected by human impact.  Now these forests are warming at a rate above the global average.  This has a number of effects:  In the southern parts of the boreal forest. Conditions are becoming too warm for cold adapted trees; their growth is slowed and they may die. With the warming comes increased dryness, which leads to water stress and increased risk of insect attack /  infestation. The dryness also means that forest fires are more likely and occur with increased ferocity.  This year, the fires in Canada have been particularly extensive and damaging.  Some 18.5M hectares went up in flames.   The plumes of smoke spread far and wide. [caption id="attachment_40597" align="aligncenter" width="675"] Canadian forest fire[/caption] Scientists are now using satellites to track changes in the extent of the boreal forests.  If trees are being lost on the southern edge of these forest, then it might be expected that the northern limit for tree growth might change.  Indeed, there is some evidence for this in Alaska where young Spruce are now growing some 25 miles beyond the previous tree line, moving into the ‘treeless tundra’.  It may be the loss on the southern edge is compensated by extension of the most northern parts of the boreal forest, but it is not clear whether tree can ‘move’ at the rate of climate change.  

In a previous woodlands.co.uk blog, Professor  Dave Goulson (University of Sussex) has written about the problems that bees and bumblebees face.  Recently, he joined with Clipper teas (who produce organic tea products) to again emphasise the problems that bees and other pollinators face, and to explain how our lives would be affected if they were to be lost.  Bee, bumblebee and other pollinator populations are at risk or in decline.  Professor Goulson estimates that there are some 6,000 different species of pollinating insects in the U.K alone, but they face risks as a result of Habitat loss Pollution Climate change Use of pesticides (insecticides, herbicides, fungicides) [caption id="attachment_36158" align="aligncenter" width="650"] Hoverfly foraging[/caption] Whilst it is true that insecticides such as neonicotinoids are directly toxic to bees and bumblebees, many other compounds used as herbicides and fungicides are also harmful to these insects.  Obviously herbicides get rid of weeds, but weeds or wild flowers are a food source for these pollinators.  Pesticides can have what are termed  ‘sub-lethal effects’, so that the learning ability of the insects is reduced.  Bees and bumblebees can learn which flowers are best as food sources, they can navigate to and from their nests / hives through open countryside.  Also these compounds can affect their resistance to disease, and their fertility / reproduction. It is a concern that that bees’ honey stores may contain a cocktail of several pesticides that the bees have encountered during their foraging.  In collecting pollen and nectar, a single bee may visit / pollinate four thousands flowers in a day. Not only are many thousands of  wild flowers species dependent on bees for pollination but some three quarters of our food crops also need bees and other insects.  Without them, the range and availability fo fruit and vegetables in our supermarkets would be substantially reduced. Whilst going organic and reducing reliance on the many forms of pesticide agriculturally is great help to pollinators, there is also good news in that small growers and even domestic gardeners can have a positive impact on the numbers of bees and others pollinators, such as : Planting a range bee-friendly plants in their gardens Creating a wild flower area in the garden or Allowing the lawn to grow up to form a small meadow like area Reducing the use of all pesticides - insecticides, herbicides, fungicides etc.

Across the globe, insects are in decline.  There are several (over-lapping) causes of the decline, ranging from habitat loss, the effect of artificial lighting, the use of agrochemicals (e.g. the neonicotinoids) and herbicides,  such as glyphosate.  The latter is one of the most commonly used weedkillers and might not be expected to affect insects.  However, recent research has shown that it can affect the formation of the hard exoskeleton of beetles.  It does this  by affecting their symbiotic bacteria; these contribute an essential building block (an amino acid) for the exoskeleton. Early summer should be ‘peak beetle time’ Read more...

This month a paper appeared in the Science Mag authored by people at the Cambridge Conservation Group; it argues that the present focus on the (western) honey bee (Apis mellifera) is misguided. The honey bee is indeed the most important single species for crop pollination, and there has been a rapid growth in the number of managed colonies over the last 50 years.  This is especially true in areas where this honey bee species has been introduced.  It was introduced to the Americas in the 1600’s.   Read more...

According to the British Arachnological Society, there are some 654 different species of spider in the U.K.   However, a recent survey they undertook (in conjunction with Natural Resources Wales) suggests that 16% of our spider species are threatened.   Eighteen of these species are critically endangered and eighty four species are classified as vulnerable or endangered. The terms used are based on those of IUCN Red List categories, so critically endangered means Extremely high risk of extinction in the wild. Read more...